| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Cartoons & Comics / Digital Media / Cartoons / Drawings | ©2012-2013 ~wingsofwrath |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `ChewedKandi has certainly gone out of her way to keep the vector community on the right path. Always making sure that her talents are infinitely scalable, Sharon has put her bezier curves to excellent use, and firmly anchored herself as an inspirational leader. We're absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for June 2013 to `ChewedKandi. Congratulations, Sharon! Read More
|
Sta.sh
The Brits are only playable in multiplayer but get decent stuff, more-so than the Americans, who, in my opinion are the weakest nation in terms of equipment. You can fight the Germans or the Americans pretty much on equal terms and you can survive against the Russians if you're lucky, since they, of course, true to history get really big guns and a lot of reinforcements... My brother and I reached an agreement - if one of us chooses the Russians then the other one also gets the Russians, else the game is jut unbalanced.
From the multiple rocket launchers in the game the Mattress has the lowest range, but it fires the most rockets. The worst part is that the Mattress is not mounted on a self propelled carriage like the Katyusha or the T34 Calliope, so you need to assign a vehicle to tow it.
The other rocket launchers each have their own drawbacks - the Nebelwerfer launches massive rockets and has a great range but only shoots a few of them and it also needs to be towed around, the Katyusha also fires a lot of rockets but it's very inaccurate and while mounted on a truck it can be disabled by infantry due to it being completely unarmored and the Calliope is mounted on a Sherman which gives it the best mobility and protection, but the rockets themselves kind of lack punch when compared with the others.